The Cambridge dictionary defines dogma as:
A principle, belief, or set of tenets laid down by an authority as undeniably true. It typically expects acceptance without doubt or question and is most commonly used to describe established religious doctrines or rigid political and philosophical ideologies.
It is necessary for the church to be clear about what it believes. The problem with dogma is not about being clear on what we believe is the truth (which we should do) but about expecting others inside and outside of our religious organizations to accept it without doubt or question.
Doubts and questions are inevitable. In fact, they are beneficial. People who accept new information without testing its veracity are susceptible to error and delusion. Enquiry is the very pathway to learning. Luke chapter two records a time when Jesus was 12 years old, and His parents lost Him and went searching for Him for 3 days. When they finally found Him, He was sitting among the religious teachers, listening to them and asking questions. The end of the chapter records that Jesus grew in wisdom and in stature. Asking questions was an intrinsic part of Jesus’ growth.
This seems to be a forgotten pathway to wisdom, as our Sunday schools often seem to emphasize learning Scripture passages by rote and discourage questions and debate, favouring instead unquestioning acquiescence. Then we wonder why our children drift from the faith when they encounter contradictory world views in university or if their beliefs are tested by the storms of life. Our very church setup is mostly a one-way flow of information from the pulpit, rather than a two-way dialogue. Sadly, even the Bible study small groups often fall into the same format. That’s one of the things we deliberately designed out of our Authentic Joy discipleship groups. We share some information beforehand, and then the entire meeting is a healthy and enriching discussion where everyone participates, and we ensure that everyone feels safe to be authentic.
Beliefs accepted only because some authority figure said it was the truth have shallow roots. Truths must be turned over and inspected from different angles, tested against our experienced reality, and interrogated thoroughly so that our eventual adoption is not based on mindlessly going-with-the-flow but a full-bodied and conscious seizing of the best model that we have for life (given what we know up to that point).
Humble and wise Christians always leave room for doubt because we know that we see now dimly. We older folks, especially, have already had the experience of changing our stance in areas where we thought we were absolutely right. So we know that what seems self-evident now can become less evident later on.
So, how do we create a culture that is safe for people to doubt, struggle, and question? I have a few suggestions:
- Keep statements of faith or ‘what we believe’ as short as possible. Cover the core tenets. I believe that the Nicene Creed is sufficient for every Christian church. This leaves more room for diversity of views and healthy discussion and debate.
- Stop expressing beliefs like dictatorial edicts in conversation. Own your beliefs as just that – your beliefs.
- Remove as many penalties as possible for not holding a popular opinion. Sometimes we restrict people’s eligibility to be a member, participate, or serve if they do not believe what we believe. At my local church, we say that you can belong before you believe. I think it’s a good credo.
- When someone expresses a ‘contrary’ view, don’t shout them down, dismiss them, shame them, or speak to them condescendingly. Instead, listen, be curious, ask questions. When they push the boundaries of our ability to defend our view, take it as a challenge to dig deeper instead of becoming defensive and dismissing them or using our positional or social power to bend them into submission.
In my lifetime, I have held, and still hold, some unpopular religious beliefs. I have found some who agree with me wholeheartedly, some who disagree with me vehemently, and some who find talking about our beliefs unimportant and uninteresting (they are happy to accept what they are told without doing any mental hard work). What is rare are persons who disagree but remain open, curious, and willing to engage. I treasure such people, and I hope that I myself can be a safe space for doubters like Thomas and questioners like Job.














